page contents
skip navigation
Home Players & Parents Coaches Officials Team USA Membership Safety About Help

U.S. Inline Team Tops Canada, 5-3

06/03/2013, 12:00pm MDT
By USA Hockey

DRESDEN, Germany –Pat Cannone(Bayport, N.Y.) scored twice to help the United States defeat Canada, 5-3, and collect its second win in as many games here today at the 2013 International Ice Hockey Federation InLine World Championship.

Cannone notched his first goal at 2:14 of the opening period. Taking the puck from behind his own net, Cannone skated the length of the rink and launched a wrist shot into the far corner of the net for the tally. The U.S. put 16 more shots Canadian goaltender Brett Leggat throughout the period but was unable to increase its lead.

2013 Inline thumb 1Early in the second stanza, Cody Kettler (St. Louis, Mo.) converted to give the U.S. a two-goal advantage. Travis Noe (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) slid the puck across the slot to find Kettler, who lifted the puck over Leggat's glove for the score. Canada cut the U.S. lead in half at 7:50, sending the game into halftime at 2-1.

Canada tied the game at 4:17 of the third period before Cannone notched his second of the game at 8:48. Matt White (Whittier, Calif.) gave Cannone the puck deep in Team USA's end and Cannone skated through the Canadian defense before sliding the puck between the goalie's legs while falling down. U.S. goaltender Nick Maricic (Alta Loma, Calif.) made several key saves to preserve the one-goal lead into the final frame.

At 2:06 of the fourth period, White reestablished the two-goal lead for Team USA with a power-play goal. Noe fed White in the high slot and connected on a one-timer that found the top corner of the net. Junior Cadiz (Los Angeles, Calif.) sealed the U.S. victory at the 4:53 mark with a deke that beat both a Canadian defenseman and Leggat in one move. Canada scored with 2:08 remaining, but would get no closer as the U.S. won 5-3.

Maricic made 31 stops for Team USA in the win, while Leggat turned aside 55 shots for Canada.

Team USA will be back in action Tuesday (June 4) at 8:00 a.m. EDT against Slovakia.

NOTES: Pat Cannone was named Team USA's player of the game ... Travis Noe leads the tournament with four goals and seven points ... Goaltender Nick Maricic is an alumnus of USA Hockey's National Team Development Program (2006-08) and won the 2013 NCAA Men's Frozen Four as a member of Yale University ... Joe Cook (Mission Viejo, Calif.), a former U.S. National Inline Team member, is serving as head coach of the U.S. National Inline Team for the fourth time ... In the 16 year history of the IIHF InLine Hockey World Championship, the United States has won five gold medals (1996, 1997, 2004, 2006, 2010), four silver medals (1998, 2001, 2009, 2011) and three bronze medals (2000, 2003, 2005). There was no tournament held in 1999.

Scoring By Period
Team    1    2    3    4    Total
USA    1    1    1    2    5
CAN    0    1    1    1    3
First Period - Scoring: 1, USA, Cannone, 2:14. Penalties: CAN, French (interference), 5:37; USA, Alexander (high-sticking), 8:20; USA, J. Yoder (hooking), 9:14; CAN, Woods (hooking), 10:02; USA, Rodriguez (interference), 10:40.
Second Period - Scoring: 2, USA, Kettler (Noe), 2:31; 3, CAN, Terry (Woods), 7:50. Penalties: CAN, Garb (high-sticking), 2:11; USA, Rodriguez (cross-checking), 2:11; CAN, French (tripping), 5:27; CAN, Ross (slashing), 10:22; USA, Eveland (tripping), 11:38.
Third Period - Scoring: 4, CAN, Grassi (Ross), 4:17; 5, USA, Cannone (White), 8:48. Penalties: CAN, Grassi (slashing), 9:44; USA, White (tripping), 10:17.
Fourth Period - Scoring: 6, USA, White (Noe), 2:06 (pp); 7, USA, Cadiz (Eveland), 4:53; 8, CAN, French (Baumgartner), 9:52. Penalties: CAN, Terry (kneeing), 1:01; CAN, Corbeil (holding), 5:31; CAN, Ross (roughing), 11:48; CAN, Ross (roughing), 11:48; USA, Arcibal (roughing), 11:48; USA, Arcibal (roughing), 11:48; USA, Cannone (holding); 11:50.

Shots by Period 1 2 3 4 Total
USA    17    12    16    15    60
CAN    6    11    12    5    34
Goaltenders (SH/SV)    1    2    3    4    Total
USA, Maricic, 48:00    6/6    11/10    12/11    5/4    34/31
CAN, Leggat, 47:20    17/16    12/11    16/15    15/13    60/55
Power Play: USA 1-7; CAN 0-6

Penalties: USA 9-13.5; CAN 10-15

Related News

Most Popular Articles

The Northstars Never Miss a Trip To Eagle River

08/29/2015, 11:00am MDT
By Greg Bates - Special to

The Bloomington, Ill., team played their in fifth straight Pond Hockey Championships in 2015


08/25/2015, 3:30pm MDT
By USA Hockey

No one has ever said that officiating, and especially officiating ice hockey, was easy. Rule knowledge, communication skills, fitness, skating and a natural presence are just some of the skills necessary to be a successful official.  Some possess more of these skills and those are the officials who advance to higher levels. But regardless of the level achieved or the skill set the official possesses, the one quality that should be equal among every official is a high level of integrity.

The national official staff members, along with our volunteer referees-in-chief and local supervisors, have heard growing concerns over a decreasing level of integrity among our youth hockey officials. It’s sometimes said that no one is holding them accountable. A portion of this perception is likely a typical “blame the officials” mentality, but some anecdotal evidence suggests there is also some merit to this concern. That’s alarming to USA Hockey, as it affects the credibility of our entire program, along with every member it represents. The blunt truth is this: even one official who isn’t on the up and up can and will damage the credibility of all officials who do take pride in the integrity of their work.

Whether we like it or not, officials are under a microscope, and by the nature of the business, are held to a very high standard. When we signed up for this officiating gig, we committed ourselves to represent the game of hockey, USA Hockey, our local group of officials and ourselves as people of integrity who accept the responsibility and guardianship of enforcing the rules in a fair and consistent manner. Most importantly, we must remember that the game is bigger than all of us and that the game itself is what we serve. Those who lose sight of that not only compromise the competitive fairness of the games, they also make life more difficult for all of the officials by damaging the credibility of the officiating community.

An example of this type of unacceptable behavior occurred last season. A Level 2 adult official tended to work his games with a chip on his shoulder. He often created confrontation with coaches, alienated his younger partners with inaccurate advice and disregarded their help in attempting to get some calls and rule applications right. Even though the help they were providing was correct, he chose to maintain his incorrect position that affected the outcome of several games. He also tended to identify certain players and single them out for various infractions and/or on-ice lectures as a means of emphasizing his authority.

Once the trends were identified, concerns were voiced by several parents and coaches to the local assigner and supervisor, who acknowledged they had never seen the official’s work, but would keep throwing him out there working the same teams and levels that had expressed concerns regarding his attitude. This included intentionally assigning him a playoff game involving the coach who was the most vocal in expressing concerns. This official was then instructed to “throw the coach out if he says anything.”

That playoff game went without a hitch – a tight 2-1 game with a couple of close off-side plays and maybe an icing or two missed. In the post-game dressing room, the official in question, in the presence of his partners and the officials scheduled to work the next game, said, “It’s always a great day when you can make one or both of the coaches mad. It’s too bad the white team coach didn’t want to play along today.” The partners sat there in silence until finally a 12-year-old Level 1 official who was working the next game said, “I don’t think that’s right. We’re not supposed to bait coaches.”

The official got dressed quickly and left the room without saying another word. Kind of ironic that it was the innocent 12-year-old that seemed to “get it” and instill a sense of accountability among those in the room. Imagine how any 12-year-old player feels on the ice when they see the official(s) displaying an attitude that is simply not to the standard the game deserves. And yes, more often than not, they can see through those who do not have the level of integrity expected.

Fortunately, these types of officials are few and far between. But they do exist and to simply stick our heads in the sand and not address the concern is irresponsible. Each of us, as officials, has an obligation to behave in a professional manner at all times and take our role seriously. We have made a commitment to approach each game with the understanding that the game is about the players and we should be invisible until the players require us to appear as a result of infractions that occur. Respect is a two-way street and simply putting on the sweater with the USA Hockey crest suggests respect is warranted, but only if supported by your actions.

USA Hockey has an obligation to create a non-threatening environment that promotes respect for officials and an opportunity for officials to improve through education and evaluation. USA Hockey does this through playing rules, points of emphasis, zero tolerance policies and comprehensive education programs for officials, coaches, parents and players.

In return, the game expects USA Hockey officiating members to bring a professional image to every contest and an attitude that creates a positive environment and makes the game better. We realize everyone makes mistakes – it’s part of the game. However, laziness or unprofessional behavior is unacceptable and being creative in rule enforcement and not holding players/coaches accountable for infractions will only make the next team of officials’ jobs much more difficult and set them up for failure.

The reality is that the game official must always hold themselves to the highest level of integrity and behavior both on and off the ice. Maybe that’s fair, or maybe not, but it is the expectation we are required to meet.

As we head into the 2015-16 season, ask yourself if you are willing to meet that expectation. If the answer is yes, welcome back and we look forward to a great season.

Paralympian Pauls Featured on CBS News

08/28/2015, 10:15am MDT

Gold medalist interviewed on national television

Tag(s): Inline